Did Israel Ritually Murder Charlie Kirk?
Examining the dark coincidences beyond the official investigation and conspiracy theories
“I think we are farmed,” Charles Fort said of humanity. It was Fort who also suggested that man deliberately invented the dogma of materialism in order to shield himself from the evidence of what was being done to him by means of psycho-spiritual warfare methods hyped by “coincidence,” symbolism and ritual.
—Michael Hoffman, Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare
On the afternoon of Wednesday, September 10th, 2025, I experienced something I will never forget as long as I live. I had just got done cleaning up after my dogs made a mess and took the opportunity to habitually check my X feed. Nothing could have prepared me for what I was about to see. The instant I opened the app, I was confronted with a disclaimer and a close up video of Charlie Kirk sitting in the usual scene with mic in hand at a TPUSA event. I mistakenly let my impulses get the best of me and clicked on the video, which I surely do not need to describe.
A second after he uttered his last word, “violence,” I knew I just watched this man die. I nearly dropped my phone and instinctively crossed myself, said “Lord have mercy” and felt so sick to my stomach, I went inside to lay down.
After collecting my thoughts, I realized something that deeply disturbed me. I just watched a gore video that I would have never otherwise consented to watch, because it is what the algorithm put in front of my face the moment I opened the app. Being a hardened internet veteran, I had seen my fair share of gore videos as a curious teen with access to the infamous rotten.com website. But this one hit different to say the least. Love him or hate him, Charlie Kirk was someone who we all developed a parasocial relationship with. In fact, Charlie had established himself as a main political voice across social media to the point where we would all see his face on a daily basis.
However, that is not the only thing that made me sick to my stomach. It was also the fact that I found out about his death in the most traumatic way possible, aside from witnessing it in person at the event. Nothing could have prepared any of us for that, and I would have gladly opted out from seeing it if given the choice. Such is the nature of algorithmically propagated psychological warfare–there is no consent, only constant mind rape, all to groom us for the next ritual.
As shocking as Kirk’s viral bloody assassination was, it’s imperative to remember that we were supposed to see Donald Trump’s head get blown off on the world stage in July of 2024. Whether or not the bullet was intended to actually put a hole in Trump’s head or pierce his ear, the psychological warfare effectively primed the world to witnessing bloodshed by political violence. While not a politician, Charlie Kirk undoubtedly had the biggest influence on an entire generation of voters. The New York Times called TPUSA “the nation's pre-eminent conservative youth organization.”
A surface level view may presume any link to the Trump assassination attempt was due to TPUSA acting as an arm of the Republican party to recruit young voters to the MAGA movement, as Kirk consistently defended every single one of Trump’s policies. It is no mystery that he was also a notorious Zionist who unapologetically defended Israel’s genocide in Gaza. A report from The Gray Zone noted:
“From its inception, [Kirk’s] career was propelled by Zionist donors, who showered his young organization with money through neoconservative outfits like the David Horowitz Freedom Center. He repaid his wealthy backers over the years by unleashing a relentless firehose of anti-Palestinian and Islamophobic diatribes, accepting propaganda trips to Israel, and sternly shutting down nationalist forces challenging his support for Israel during TPUSA events. In the Trump era, few American gentiles had proved more valuable to the self-proclaimed Jewish state than Charlie Kirk.”
It has been one week since the assassination of Charlie Kirk and each day, new information is coming out from both the official investigation and the conspiracy community, both of which are further distorting the event into a confusing mess. I have personally been waiting to draw any conclusions on what happened since there was almost nothing of substance to conclude. Is it fair to assume Israel involvement prior to discovering evidence of dancing Israelis? As Ron Unz argues in “American Pravda: Mossad Assassinations”:
Their use of political assassination as a central tool of their statecraft even recalls the notorious activities of the Old Man of the Mountains of the 13th century Middle East, whose deadly techniques gave us the very word “assassin.”
Speculation of a Mossad conspiracy went into overdrive with a report published on September 15th by Max Blumenthal, who received intel from a Trump insider and longtime friend of Kirk suggesting “the assassinated conservative leader’s turning point on Israeli influence provoked a private backlash from Netanyahu’s allies that left him angry and afraid.” He began to discuss Epstein as an Israeli intelligence asset, the Israeli government’s involvement in the October 7th attacks, and platformed prominent anti-Zionists like Dave Smith and Tucker Carlson.
An unverified report from Candace Owens which has sparked a lot of debate online claims that Kirk also turned down Netanyahu’s all expense paid trip to Israel along with an offer of $150 million in cash for TPUSA to adopt an even more ardently pro-Israel stance. In other words, Charlie Kirk was starting to bite the hand that fed him.
With Kirk having tremendous influence and growth of his movement among American youth, questioning Israel’s involvement in U.S. politics would make Kirk the most dangerous anti-Zionist in America. Consider how this aligns with the concerns expressed by ADL president Jonathan Greenblatt:
Here in the US, the percentage of Americans with “significant” or "elevated" antisemitic attitudes jumped last year to 24 percent, more than double the 2019 figure and the highest level we’ve seen since 1964. And for the first time since we started doing these analyses, the younger generation is now notably more antisemitic than the older generation. That is an ominous sign if there ever was one.
Unsurprisingly, the number of anti-Jewish incidents in the US has reached record levels in four of the past five years. And in the 12 months after 10/7, there were more than 10,000 antisemitic incidents in America; that’s the highest number ADL has ever recorded in any single 12-month period since we started tracking such data in the 1970s. Or again, on college campuses, more than 83 percent of Jewish students have witnessed or experienced antisemitism since 10/7.1
Blumenthal notes that in one of his final interviews with Ben Shapiro, Israel’s top guy in America, Kirk started flying too close to the sun.
“A friend said to me, interestingly: ‘Charlie, okay, we’ve pushed back against the media on COVID, on lockdowns, on Ukraine, on the border,’” Kirk told Shapiro on September 9. “Maybe we should also ask the question: is the media totally presenting the truth when it comes to Israel? Just a question!”
Israel has a pretty horrible reputation of committing acts of terror in the US so the assumptions of their involvement will continue until proven otherwise. Now Blumenthal’s report is under fire for its lack of evidence as we speak, even by many prominent voices on the right who have a strong track record of connecting Israeli involvement with terrorist attacks on America. Although the FBI has also thus far provided contradictory and highly questionable information in their ongoing investigation.
However, we are here to dive deeper under the surface of the FBI investigation, where we find what appears to be a dark ritual sacrifice in a series of demonic synchronicities.



